Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Alexander (newsreader) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Lucy Alexander (newsreader) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable newsreader, The 2 cites in the article are simply mentions, and "FindMyPast" isn't a reliable source, Searched on Google & Highbeam and found nothing except this, Fails GNG,
- I AFD'd the article back in 2015 and sources were found ... however at the time for whatever reason I hadn't checked them properly and just assumed they were okay but I've now just realized they're for the TV presenter Lucy Alexander not the newscaster.... So thanks to my stupidity here we are again..., Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging NinjaRobotPirate and Tomwsulcer who !voted at the prev AFD. –Davey2010Talk 16:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable. Electoralist (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It's confusing to have two television personalities with the same name. If I remember correctly, that was one of the reasons why I said I had to filter my results rather aggressively. I don't see significant coverage of this Lucy Alexander. Searching for "lucy alexander" "london tonight" and other variations of her credits turns up nothing but social media and promotional websites. I argued recently that a regional Emmy could satisfy WP:ANYBIO criterion #1 and that got shot down pretty quickly. So, I'm thinking that a regional award from the Royal Television Society isn't good enough, either. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing suggests convincingly enough notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.